The other day I was happily grinding the pirates along the coast of Tanaris, and in front of me surrounded by pirates I saw a chest. "Woo!" thought I, but then I noticed an orcish warrior also heading his way through the pirates towards the chest! A race was on. He was most of the way through his pirate, and there was one between me and the chest! Oh noes!
I hit stealth, fearful that the orc would kill me while I was preoccupied by the last pirate, and I waited for the orc to kill his pirate and the one I had left. The orc then started to open the chest which was when I slid out of the shadows and butchered him, I then looted the chest for myself and went on my way.
Would you consider this behaviour out of order? It was a split second decision and I decided that IC Azyrae would not allow an enemy to take the loot and would kill him and take it for herself. But OOC I felt a little guilty - he got to the chest first and I not only stole it, but murdered him for it as well.
Out of Order?
-
- Guest
My orc would not but I as my orc would have the same dilemna.
If the other player was the same faction as me then I would have probably allowed him to grab the chest, or as we arrived at the same time at least asked him to /roll for it (even though this usually ends up with them ignoring me and taking it anyway).
Maybe I just worry too much about where that line between the 'fun for all' policy that I have and Azyrae's IC reasoning is.
If the other player was the same faction as me then I would have probably allowed him to grab the chest, or as we arrived at the same time at least asked him to /roll for it (even though this usually ends up with them ignoring me and taking it anyway).
Maybe I just worry too much about where that line between the 'fun for all' policy that I have and Azyrae's IC reasoning is.